Last year at the Disney Investor Day, a brand new streaming service, Star+, was announced for Latin America, which would bring together general entertainment TV series and movies from The Walt Disney Company’s content studios, including Disney Television Studios, FX, 20th Century Studios, 20th Television, Touchstone, and more, in addition to being streaming live sports from ESPN.

Unlike the rest of the world, which had “Star” added to Disney+ as a sixth brand featuring more mature content, Latin America was getting a hybrid of ESPN+ and Star.  Also, earlier in the year, Disney rebranded its Fox television channels to Star throughout Latin America.

Originally Star+ was due to launch in June, but it was delayed until the end of August.  While Disney announced the delay was more due to the issues with sporting events, there was a legal issue being put forward by Starz Entertainment, which operates StarzPlay (Starz) around the world.


Starz Entertainment filed a dispute for the registered trademark in Brazil, Argentina and Mexico. Stating that because StarzPlay and Star+ are in the same category, it will lead to people being confused. They’ve also opposed the trademarks for the Star Channel, Life, Hits, Fun, Action, Comedy and Classics and Premium channels.

Then in June, a lawsuit was filed to stop Disney from launching Star+, stating:


“Disney’s decision to launch a standalone general entertainment streaming service under the name ‘Star+’ and rename its existing channels to ‘Star’ in Latin America — despite the prior existence of and trademark registrations for Starz’s own similarly named StarzPlay general entertainment streaming service — is extremely likely to cause customer confusion in the Latin American marketplace and infringes on Starz’s marks. Such customer confusion can be impossible to remedy and will likely only increase as Disney launches its marketing blitz in those regions.”

In Brazil, the São Paulo Court ruled in favour of Disney in the lawsuit, however during an appeal that took place this week, Jorge Tosta , of the 2nd Reserved Chamber of Business Law of the Court of Justice of São Paulo , upheld the appeal,  saying that Disney must refrain from using the phrase ” STARPLUS ” or “STAR + ” in its new streaming service.  Stating:

there is a possibility that the consumer may be confused or link one brand to another, as if it were from the same business or economic group, causing harm to the holder of the registration or patent “.

This will no doubt have a major issue for Disney to overcome in Latin America. At the same time, there are many ways around this, such as Disney paying Starz Entertainment to use the name (which Disney is already using worldwide, following its purchase of 20th Century Fox).

Or Disney might have to change its strategy in the region completely.  Such as moving Star into Disney+, like it has done in the UK, Australia and Canada, with ESPN+ hosting all the sports content.  Merge everything in with Disney+, as it has done with Disney+ Hotstar in India. Or come up with a brand new name for Star+.


Any way you look at it, the Star+ launch in August is looking less likely.  However, it should be expected that Disney will still try to work a legal way around the situation.

What do you think Disney should down with Star+ now in Latin America.

Source – Vcfaz








Roger Palmer

Roger has been a Disney fan since he was a kid and this interest has grown over the years. He has visited Disney Parks around the globe and has a vast collection of Disney movies and collectibles. He is the owner of What's On Disney Plus & DisKingdom. Email: Roger@WhatsOnDisneyPlus.com Twitter: Twitter.com/RogPalmerUK Facebook: Facebook.com/rogpalmeruk

Related Article

Leave a Reply to Han Wilson Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

4 Comments

  1. Luke Skywalker July 24, 2021

    Disney should bring Hulu to Latin America instead. Disney can't use the Star brand anymore. Hulu makes more sense because Disney owns the Hulu brand already.

    1. Joshua Selig July 25, 2021

      It uses the Star brand in Europe and the majority of Asia, the reason for using Star was to get away from Hulu, as using the latter I believe could cause rights issues with Comcast who still own part of Hulu. Further complicating matters is that I understand Disney and Comcast are in Arbitration proceedings about the valuation of Hulu as the latter believes that Disney abandoning the idea of using Hulu abroad and moving to Star+ has reduced the value of the company. The reason that is an issue, is that in 2024, Comcast can force the buy out of their 33% stake in Hulu, which at the time would have been valued at around $9-13bn, by doing what Disney did and that Comcast are no longer funding Hulu as per the agreement, Comcast feel that Disney are exploiting the situation in an attempt to reduce the valuation of their stake. Because Comcast are now longer funding Hulu, it is believed that their stake would be diluted, by how much is unclear as they are in dispute as to how much the company is now worth. However, there is always the possibility that the company is now worth more than it was when the agreement was made, so should be interesting to see how much Hulu is worth after it has been assessed by independent experts.

  2. Han Wilson July 24, 2021

    Hulu is a nice replacement.

  3. Michael July 26, 2021

    this is not a big deal they can just use hulu or disney + with a new name for all of fox they own over there